Teva awarded section 8 damages regarding pregabalin and olanzapine
by Shirley Liang Komosa »
On March 30 and April 4, 2017, the Federal Court released two decisions on the merits under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (“PMNOC Regulations”) regarding pregabalin (Pfizer’s LYRICA) in Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2017 FC 332 (the “pregabalin decision”) and olanzapine (Eli Lilly’s ZYPREXA) in Eli Lilly Canada Inc v Teva Canada Limited, 2017 FC 88 (the “olanzapine decision”). In both decisions, the Court made factual findings that provided direction for a final calculation of Teva’s damages. Notably, an adjustment for “pipefill” was permitted in pregabalin, but not in olanzapine. Generally, pipefill is the difference in a company’s ex-factory sales and IMS retail sales.
Read more »
PMNOC proceedings
Medicine:
|
aripiprazole tablets (ABILIFY)
|
Applicants:
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Co.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
|
Respondents:
|
Teva Canada Limited, Actavis Pharma Company and the Minister of Health
|
|
|
Date Commenced:
|
April 12, 2017
|
Court File No.:
|
T-530-17
|
Comment:
|
Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of Patents Nos. 2,426,921; 2,713,466; 2,689,052; 2,688,934; 2,688,915; 2,689,051;
2,429,496; 2,700,314; 2,526,562; and 2,511,619.
Teva alleges non-infringement and invalidity.
|
Medicine:
|
atazanavir sulphate capsules (REYATAZ)
|
Applicants:
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Co. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland
|
Respondents:
|
Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC and the Minister of Health
|
|
|
Date Commenced:
|
April 6, 2017
|
Court File No.:
|
T-507-17
|
Comment:
|
Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of Patent No. 2,317,736. Mylan alleges invalidity.
|
Other Proceedings
Medicine:
|
filgrastim (NEUPOGEN and NEULASTA)
|
Plaintiff:
|
Amgen Inc.
|
Defendant:
|
BGP Pharma ULC dba Mylan EPD
|
Date Commenced:
|
April 5, 2017
|
Court File No.:
|
T-501-17
|
Comment:
|
Action for a declaration that claims 43-47 of Patent No. 1,341,537 are valid.
|
Medicine:
|
Unidentified
|
Applicant:
|
Unidentified Innovator Company
|
Respondent:
|
The Attorney General of Canada and the Minister of Health
|
Date Commenced:
|
March 31, 2017
|
Court File No.:
|
T-485-17
|
Comment:
|
Application for a Declaration that a new drug submission filed by the applicant does not trigger the application of section 5 of the PMNOC Regulations and that the applicant is not a second person.
|
To check the status of Federal Court cases, please click here. |